An analytical philosophical friend of mine, made a judgment about my decisions and judgments, so I will treat his thesis thusly:
1 - A person who would attempt to take a charge in a pick up game of basketball only if that selfsame person watches too much televised professional basketball.
2 - Sea-Dog attempted to take a charge in a pick up game of basketball.
Therefor - Sea-Dog watches too much televised professional basketball.
I argue against the first premise (1). My friend is failing to account for times when an overly aggressive individual necessitates such action due to the fact that they are ruining a perfectly fine game by driving and using physical intimidation, scoring every time. Even triple teaming this player would not deter him, and he would not share the ball with other teammates. Showing him one would stand their ground and stop the drive was the intent of the attempt. Therefor, I rule that premise one is false!
However I do credit my friend for one success. The conclusion is true. So the argument is trivially true. One would hit closer to the core of the issue if one said -
1 - a person who watches nearly every playoff game watches too much pro b-ball.
2 - Sea-Dog watches nearly every playoff game.
Therefor Sea-Dog watches too much pro b-ball.
In other news, I got in an argument with my boss at work. Those who have known me for a long time, should not be surprised at this. It is a foregone conclusion at this point that if Sea-Dog has to work for people who do not run a tight ship, treat Sea-Dog with the respect they would expect for themself from Sea-Dog, he will be barkin' and yappin' loudly and aggressively. Most likely this will be in an ostentatious manner with the flag of JUSTICE waving high and mightily above Sea-Dog's head. The true and bitter plight of this situation, is that a telephone call was screened on Sea-Dog's brick during this argument squabble. That call was a Temp-agency informing Sea-Dog of an opportunity for Sea-Dog to work a better, more professional job at higher pay than the one he's currently slaving under. By the time the contention ceased and Sea-Dog could contact his rep, the position had been given to another, likely less-worthy temp-for-hire. Many F-words were shouted during and after this altercation. I hate my job. I am in fact Sea-Dog, but the situation is so revolting I can barely bring myself to tell it in the appropriate first-person fashion.
So, I played lots of b-ball at the Sherman Oaks Van Nuys park. My team and I won the first game of 3-on-3, so we picked up 2 new-comers and ran 5-on-5, earning 3 more victories. Celebramos! I feel great. There is no end to the list of rewards from such a day well-spent. If you have to means to do so, I think you should. It is... so choice.
I miss Santa Cruz, CA. I miss many aspects of it, and one close to the forefront of my thoughts this day is a little place to acquire burritos called "los pinos." So, as I have done in the past, I purchased up all the ingredients of one of their veggie burritos and lived with a poor substitute for the real thing.
One good aspect of this venture is that you get to eat a nigh-limitless amount of burritos for the price of about two from a tacqueria. One bad aspect of this venture is that you buy in such bulk that you have to eat burritos 3 times a day, day in day out to make use of the perishable ingredients. One good aspect of this venture is that you are eating burritos 3 times a day, day in day out. It's a mixed bag. The bottom line is that I miss the old haunts, the old friends, and the memories that used to be my daily life.
Oh! I like when I am broke. Because it forces me to buy cheap ingredients, and I had forgotten that the really cheap, weird Mexican brands of salsa are always the most fantastic. The more non-descript or unfamiliar the label, the greater the likelihood of a thrilling surprise when you open up that jar.
10 years ago